Writing books often exhort you to “write a shitty first draft,” but I always resisted this advice. After all,
- I was already writing shitty drafts, even when I tried to write good ones. Why go out of my way to make them shittier?
- A shitty first draft just kicks the can down the road, doesn’t it? Sooner or later, I’d have to write a good draft—why put it off?
- If I wrote without judging what I wrote, how would I make any creative choices at all?
- That first draft inevitably obscured my original vision, so I wanted it to be at least slightly good.
- Writing something shitty meant I was shitty.
So for years, I kept writing careful, cramped, painstaking first drafts—when I managed to write at all. At last, writing became so joyless, so draining, so agonizing for me that I got desperate: I either needed to quit writing altogether or give the shitty-first-draft thing a try.
Turns out everything I believed about drafting was wrong.
For the last six months, I’ve written all my first drafts in full-on don’t-give-a-fuck mode. Here’s what I’ve learned so far:
“Shitty first draft” is a misnomer
A rough draft isn’t just a shitty story, any more than a painter’s preparatory sketch is just a shitty painting. Like a sketch, a draft is its own kind of thing: not a lesser version of the finished story, but a guide for making the finished story.
Once I started thinking of my rough drafts as preparatory sketches, I stopped fretting over how “bad” they were. Is a sketch “bad”? And actually, a rough draft can be beautiful the same way a sketch is beautiful: it has its own messy energy.
Don’t try to do everything at once
People who make complex things need to solve one kind of problem before they can solve others. A painter might need to work out where the big shapes go before they can paint the details. A writer might need to decide what two people are saying to each other before they can describe the light in the room or what those people are doing with their hands.
I’d always embraced this principle up to a point. In the early stages, I’d speculate and daydream and make messy notes. But that freedom would end as soon as I started drafting. When you write a scene, I thought, you have to start with the first word and write the rest in order. Then it dawned on me: nobody would ever see this! I could write the dialogue first and the action later; or the action first and the dialogue later; or some dialogue and action first and then interior monologue later; or I could write the whole thing like I was explaining the plot to my friend over the phone. The draft was just one very long, very detailed note to myself. Not a story, but a preparatory sketch for a story. Why not do it in whatever weird order made sense to me?
Get all your thoughts onto the page
Here’s how I used to write: I’d sit there staring at the screen and I’d think of something—then judge it, reject it, and reach for something else, which I’d most likely reject as well—all without ever fully knowing what those things were. And once you start rejecting thoughts, it’s hard to stop. If you don’t write down the first one, or the second, or the third, eventually your thought-generating mechanism jams up. You become convinced you have no thoughts at all.
When I compare my old drafts with my new ones, the old ones look coherent enough. They’re presentable as stories. But they suck as drafts, because I can’t see myself thinking in them. I have no idea what I wanted that story to be. These drafts are opaque and airless, inscrutable even to me, because a good 90% of what I was thinking while I wrote them never made it onto the page.
These days, most of my thoughts go onto the page, in one form or another. I don’t waste time figuring out how to say something, I just ask, “what are you trying to say here?” and write that down. Because this isn’t a story, it’s a plan for a story, so I just need the words to be clear, not beautiful. The drafts I write now are full of placeholders and weird meta notes, but when I read them, I can see where my mind is going. I can see what I’m trying to do. Consequently, I no longer feel like my drafts obscure my original vision. In fact, their whole purpose is to describe that vision.
Drafts are memos to future-you
To draft effectively, you need a personal drafting style or “language” to communicate with your future self (who is, of course, the author of your second draft). This language needs to record your ideas quickly so it can keep up with the pace of your imagination, but it needs to do so in a form that will make sense to you later. That’s why everyone’s drafts look different: your drafting style has to fit the way your mind works.
I’m still working mine out. Honestly, it might take a while. But recently, I started writing in fragments. That’s just how my mind works: I get pieces of sentences before I understand how to fit them together. Wrestling with syntax was slowing me down, so now I just generate the pieces and save their logical relationships for later. Drafting effectively means learning these things about yourself. And to do that, you can’t get all judgmental. You can’t fret over how you should be writing, you just gotta get it done.
Messy drafts are easier to revise
I find that drafting quickly and messily keeps the story from prematurely “hardening” into a mute, opaque object I’m afraid to change. I no longer do that thing, for instance, where I endlessly polish the first few paragraphs of a draft without moving on. Because how do you polish a bunch of fragments taped together with dashes? A draft that looks patently “unfinished” stays malleable, makes me want to dig my hands in and move stuff around.
You already have ideas
Sitting down to write a story, I used to feel this awful responsibility to create something good. Now I treat drafting simply as documenting ideas I already have—not as creation at all, but as observation and description. I don’t wait around for good words or good ideas. I just skim off whatever’s floating on the surface and write it down. It’s that which allows other, potentially better ideas to surface.
As a younger writer, my misery and frustration perpetuated themselves: suppressing so many thoughts made my writing cramped and inhibited, which convinced me I had no ideas, which made me even more afraid to write lest I discover how empty inside I really was. That was my fear, I guess: if I looked squarely at my innocent, unvetted, unvarnished ideas, I’d see how bad they truly were, and then I’d have to—what, pack up and go home? Never write again? I don’t know. But when I stopped rejecting ideas and started dumping them onto the page, the worst didn’t happen. In fact, it was a huge relief.
Next post: the practice of shitty first drafts
Tag: writing
Reasons to Keep Writing
•everyone starts small. just because you’re not big now, doesn’t mean you’ll never be. and if you’re just starting out, keep in mind those bigger blogs have been writing for much longer than you. building a following takes time.
•there will always be someone who enjoys your writing. every like, reblog, and comment is one person who enjoyed what you wrote and i can assure you they want more! and remember, not everyone remembers to leave evidence that they liked your writing or they might just be too nervous to interact with you. invisible fans exist, and you’ve got them.
•going along with that last one, your writing has the potential to help others! you could write about a minority, or maybe you could publish a little something comforting at the exact time someone else needs it. and most of the time, when you affect someone like this they’ll tell you, whether it be through tags, or a private message or whatever. that’s an amazing feeling.
•getting a compliment from someone becomes a sure-fire way to make your day better. nothing feels greater than seeing a comment from someone saying how much they love something you worked hard on. maybe write down these comments somewhere, so you can look at them when you’re feeling negative about your skills as a writer.
•writer’s block is not the end of your writing career. it sure feels like it sometimes, but everyone, even the popular writers you look up to, suffer from writer’s block. everyone puts out work they’re not 100% satisfied with sometimes, and that’s okay! when you get out of this slump, your writing will be better than ever before and you’ll enjoy it again. keep writing through a block so you can get there sooner.
These are the things I think about when I feel bad about my writing, so I hope they can help someone else too.
I know someone needs this
@idonotbitemythumbatyou asked for H! N! T! on the fanfic meme!
I’m gonna stick to Pacific Rim/Newmann answers for this since that’s the fandom we share!
H: How would you describe your style?
I’ve been thinking about this a lot late so forgive me if I ramble!
– I tend to keep a very “close POV” 3rd person/past tense, meaning we’re ALMOST inside the characters heads and see the world filtered through their perspective, but we’re just short of first person.
– I tend to focus a LOT on description and sensual details. I want you to feel and see things, that’s what I consider “success” as a writer. I also try to be visceral and make the prose itself give the flavor of the story in every line. Though lately I’ve been thinking about and practicing a lot at story structure – I want to writer fanfic where you get more out of it if you’re familiar with the source material but in theory you don’t need to and you can still get the story, as a stepping stone to writing my own original novels.
– I tend to do character-driven (borderline character study) pieces with two people in isolation and their circumstances/an off-screen villain serving as the antagonist. To the point where I probably need to stop locking my ship in a room together with the-evil-creature-that-possessed-one-of-them as the antagonist for every one of my stories because it’s getting repetitive ;P
– For my prose style, I’m influenced by Peter S Beagle and Anne Rice for my more flowery and sensual prose, and some elements of Terry Brooks for my cleaner and more informative exposition. I try to be clear enough that even English-as-a-Second-Language people can have a good time and I don’t feel a need to show off a broad vocabulary. I think a simple, visceral word is always better, but I do love to nail you between the eyes with a beautiful metaphor or the occasional philosophical observation whenever it is elegant and not intrusive to do so. My prose has been described as clean and earnest, with an “aged” feeling (when writing fantasy) and some elegant flourishes. I don’t try to tell you what you should see, I try to describe to you the important elements and then guide your brain to fill in the rest with what would be most powerful to you (ie instead of saying “she had XYZ physical features which were beautiful” say “her beauty gave off XYZ impressions” so you get a sensation more than a portrait?) Sorry to ramble on this one, I think about this a lot though!
N: Is there a fic you wish someone else would write (or finish) for you?
I frickin’ LOVE big action-packed, novel-length angsty-and-epic canon divergence fics where like “One TINY but entirely plausible thing changed so now we’re on a COMPLETELY different adventure and no one dies like in canon but it gets DARK before the dawn.”
Like I’d love to see a PR1 AU where all the Jaeger pilots survived but they all failed to close the Breach because maybe they didn’t get Newt and Hermann’s intelligence in time, so the bomb bounced off the Breachand they didn’t have another one ready, so Kaiju are just POURING in now and humanity is like, just getting CRUSHED with no hope of holding them back anymore so it’s like post-apocalyptic, Newt, Hermann, Raleigh and Mako in a hidden bunker somewhere trying to clone enough Kaiju tissue to trick the Breach and building like… a tiny submarine to deliver a nuclear warhead they scrounged from somewhere to collapse it on their own, and HOPING they don’t get EATEN in their tiny submarine along the way. Just REALLY impossible odds against them but a much smaller, more intimate and character-driven story of the TRUE final days??
T: Any fandom tropes you can’t stand?
This got a bit rambly because I wanted to ensure all the proper nuance is there in explaining that it’s less things I “can’t stand” and more things I just do differently for my own reasons.
I had a lot more squicks in the Hobbit fandom than I do in PacRim because I spent more time there and I was sort of just this side of being a Tolkien scholar so I had a lot of little pet peeves around the language the characters used (Hobbits using Yavanna as a deity) and the way certain characters were often portrayed (shrinking violet Bilbo and DFP Thorin).
For Pacific Rim, specifically Newmann I am still early enough in my reading that everything I read is pretty much fresh and amazing sooooo it’s probably less a trope but a thing I felt the need to do differently? Which I guess I would kiiiinda call Shattered Victim Newt and Straight Man Hermann?
I see some recovery fics where Newt is kinda helpless and battered as a result of his possession where I kinda want to point out that 1) we have no on-screen evidence that the Precursors used pain to control him or that he’s particularly traumatized (as of Uprising). Canonically it looks more like they hid stuff from him in his own mind, dosed him with pleasure through Alice so that he stayed in contact with them but maybe didn’t even realize that was what he was doing, and maybe just swapped out his motivations, asking him “IF you wanted to destroy the world HOW would you do it?”. Evidence points to him unraveling from being lonely and far away from grounding influences like Hermann but not necessarily tortured.
So on the one hand, I TOTALLY UNDERSTAND why fanon would make his experience traumatic in order to create real world parallels like abuse, addiction, or being a prisoner of war. I did that too in TOWOID and I’ll probably lean heavily into that with the Prisoner’s Dilemma/Kidnapping AU. It makes for a more relatable struggle BUT I’ve seen some common assumptions in recovery arcs that Newt would be broken and shrinking and scared of his own shadow in the aftermath and it’s less that I’m saying “don’t do that” (I abhor telling authors what to do) and it’s more like… “examine the canon evidence, are you doing this because it’s an artistic choice or because you just assume based on other fanon?”
Basically, I like to think Newt’s courage is still there, as his obnoxiousness, and his flaws, and his combativeness. I totally think he’s once bitten twice shy in a lot of ways and probably got a BIG dose humility served up to him on a LOT of fronts, but I don’t think he’s crying and shattered and unable to raise his voice or anything because he’s So Scared after being possessed? He’s definitely not the devil-may-care wunderkind boy genius whose only limits were what his mind could achieve anymore after. He’s been smacked HARD across the face with the dangers of flying too close to the sun. BUT I also don’t think he’d regret it because he did, legitimately, SAVE THE WORLD with that Drift! The question is the consequences, and how complicit is he in the aftermath? The level of complicity is where I think the most interesting transformation of Newt comes from in fanon, because literally every little millimeter nudge on the dial of how involved he was with the Precursor plan is an ENTIRELY different level of coping afterwards. No complicity? Maybe he’s just pissed! And crying because Hermann almost got killed! Total complicity, or convinced he’s complicit? I mean, if there’s anything of him left to have regrets at all, that’s a lot of guilt to cope with. But I still think, under all that, he’s still Newt? Or at least, that’s how I like to write him (because now that I think of it the fic where he’s really NOT NEWT anymore after is super tragic and a sadistic side of me wants to read but like… a one-shot because that’s not something I can wallow in).
As for Hermann, much easier to sum up. I like it when he’s eccentric too. And driven, and an obsessive, and probably a bit of a difficult person to be around. Sometimes I’ve seen Hermann just always being the one sighing at Newt’s antics but even in PR1 HERMANN IS SO EMBARRASSING, GUYS!! Newt is louder but Hermann is WEIRD, and he’s sweeter in Uprising but he’s still WEIRD. And even if he went into full Avenging Angel mode to save Newt I think he’d have a lot of quirks, he’d struggle with the interpersonal relationships needed to win people to his way of thinking, he’d have blindspots and biases about his own behavior and he’d be just a STRANGE PERSON, and that is person for Newt and why they’re perfect for each other because they’re BOTH REALLY WEIRD in different ways and I love that. If that makes sense?
THIS. I saw a post the other day that literally said if you do it to a fictional character, you’ll do it in real life.
No. Just NO.
I’m so glad someone put it into words.
Lin-Manuel Miranda is a legend, and he’s absolutely right.
And I really feel like there are parts of fandom that don’t get or don’t believe this, and I think that’s troubling. I’ve seen arguments that people shouldn’t have dark fantasies, or that bad impulses in themselves make a bad person. I’ve seen so much shaming over thoughts.
And if you get to a point where it’s bad to have dark thoughts and it’s bad to wonder what something would be like and it’s bad to put yourself in the shoes of anyone who isn’t “pure”, if fiction is no longer a realm where you can confront and explore, but an ongoing test of moral purity… well, maybe not everyone’s brain works like mine, but I feel like that takes away something incredibly important to being human.
Purity culture is coming full circle back to old school religious culture.
“Bad thoughts, bad!”
When your character tells you a thing and you, the author, are like, “No, you’re shitting me,” and the character’s all, “I absolutely am not,” and you realize that every single seed needed to grow that thing WAS ALREADY PLANTED IN THE STORY.
I’d like to lie and say I’m being deliberately clever when people notice things in my writing but honestly I’m just as much along for the ride as everyone else.
I’m just as much along for the ride as everyone else.
I used to say this, but then my editor pointed out that it’s literally my subconscious in action. You’re still brilliant, friends, even when you surprise yourself.
STRAIGHT. UP. sometimes the only way to do art is to not give a shit
“Sex is hard to write about because you lose the universal and succumb to the particular. We all have our different favorites. Good sex is impossible to write about. Lawrence and Updike have given it their all, and the result is still uneasy and unsure. It may be that good sex is something fiction just can’t do – like dreams. Most of the sex in my novels is absolutely disastrous. Sex can be funny, but not very sexy.”
—
Martin Amis (via writingquotes)
do you ever feel like published authors should go read some fanfiction…
(via snickfic)
Clearly if three male authors (including one who has a legendary ego the size of a small planet) can’t do something well, it can’t be done? Pffft.
(via greatgreenbird)
mmmmyeah no. see, the way you get super good at something? Is you do it ten thousand times. If you want to write exemplary sex scenes, you read thousands of good ones. You write thousands of bad ones. You beg friends who are good at writing sex scenes to critique your work. You study gender, sex, sexuality, mechanics, emotional resonance, the viscosity of different lubrication options – in yourself, in others, in research. You imagine with ever more clarity – both sex and writing.
You want to be good at writing sex scenes? You have to do exactly the same work you did to become a good writer of everything else.
so don’t pretend it can’t be done, author dudes, because there’s a million fangirls who can write lyric filthy devastating character-revealing plot-advancing poetic tender wall-slamming trope-inverting panting sweaty trope-embracing aching crying sex…..and can do it far far better than you.
(via redshoesnblueskies)
Me: ok this part shouldn’t be so bad. I know the basics of what I want to happen, so filling in a few details shouldn’t take too long
The Details™: you fool
What is the best advice to a new writer?
Start with projects you can finish in a single day. The entire process of starting and finishing a project is important to learn.
A good twist should be built into the story from the beginning.

