clintofbarton:

Pacific Rim Meme: Five Locations

The K-Science Lab

The K-Science Lab is the biochemical research laboratory where Kaiju anatomy is studied and harvested. It’s headed by Newton Geiszler and Hermann Gottlieb. Both are part of a “think tank” that is responsible for compiling information vital to categorizing the Kaiju on the Serizaawa Scale, based on their toxicity and ambient radioactivity. Geiszler works to catalog the behavior and nature of the Kaiju to discover a natural means of solving the Kaiju crisis. Hermann is dedicated to calculating the possible frequently of a Kaiju once it appears and how frequently they may attack.

avelera:

The Only Way Out is Down (53400 words) by Avelera
Chapters: 11/16 – Malebolge – Newt
Fandom: Pacific Rim (Movies), La Divina Commedia | The Divine Comedy – Dante Alighieri
Rating: Mature
Warnings: No Archive Warnings Apply
Relationships: Newton Geiszler/Hermann Gottlieb
Characters: Newton Geiszler, Hermann Gottlieb, Jake Pentecost
Additional Tags: Post-Movie: Pacific Rim: Uprising (2018), Literary References & Allusions, Coma, Rescue, Newton Geiszler is a Dork, POV Newton Geiszler, Newton Geiszler Recovery Arc, Mind Control Aftermath & Recovery, Dreamscapes, Past Relationship(s), Other Additional Tags to Be Added, The Drift (Pacific Rim), Drift Side Effects, Hell, Inferno AU, Stream of Consciousness, Worried Hermann Gottlieb, Explicit Language, Past Mind Control, POV Hermann Gottlieb, Precursors are super dead, Memory Loss, Memory Alteration, Bickering, BAMF Hermann Gottlieb, Kissing, Canon-Typical Violence, Injury, Implied/Referenced Suicide, Explicit Sexual Content, Consensual Sex, Hurt/Comfort, Seduction
Summary:

The invasion of the Anteverse was successful, and the Precursors have been destroyed, but Newt still hasn’t awoken from his coma and doesn’t respond initially to Drift attempts from Hermann to wake him.

But when one day a connection is established, Hermann and Newt find themselves in a mingled mindscape that seems informed by Dante’s “Inferno”. Together, they pass through the Nine Circles, nine memories of Newt’s years under Precursor control in the hopes it will help free Newt from his own head.

Yet questions linger: how much did the Precursors take from Newt, to what lengths will Hermann go to free him, and is the other even truly there, or merely a rabbit of the other’s making, a wish fulfillment fantasy that they’re chasing into the abyss?

Sorry for the delay, guys! Thank you for your patience, I hope you enjoy this somewhat calmer, fluffier chapter :3

Gah, I’m gonna soon be diving into the edits for ch. 12 of The Only Way Out is Down as I streamline the climax and make everything fall into place and I just *vibrates with intensity of TOWOID feelings* have a lot of emotions about this story like I know it’s a bit egotistical to say it but whatever there’s some damn fine stuff coming up and I am proud of it and I just want to make it the best it can be

Hi, my writing teacher told me that I should stop writing comedy and focus on deeper issues. I have problems writing anything serious, any advice?

neil-gaiman:

Really good comedy is very, very serious and really deep. So learn what you can, and know that you can take what you learn back to comedy one day.

UGH, shit like this is why I fucking hate 90% of creative writing classes. Yes I’ve found one really good one in my time, but the vast majority are disgruntled writers who should not be allowed to tell other writers what to do, especially not beginners. Hint: The only thing you should be telling a beginner writer is that their work is great but still growing, and they should continue to work hard telling the stories they want to tell, and as many as possible so they continue to grow and learn. 

Writing teachers like the one OP describes infuriate me because how dare you tell a writer what they should or shouldn’t write! What an abuse of your authority and the trust placed in you as a teacher. Not to mention such ugly, self-important and subjective advice. 

Telling someone how you would write something is not the same as critiquing or giving suggestion on how to improve a piece. Any teacher or critiquer should be extremely careful and always distinguish that this is how they would do it and not necessarily useful critique advice. It’s really hard to turn off the corner of your brain that says “I would have done it this way.” I get it. But experienced writers can distinguish the difference and act accordingly, with beginners the more experienced person must assume the responsibility of clarifying this. 

Of course OP has already been responded to by the illustrious Neil Gaiman, but if they do see this, I’d also add that they should continue writing whatever they want. Maybe someday “deeper” realizations will arise in their work as writers, but it should never be because some “teacher” like this one told you to and made you doubt your work. These revelations of how you want to improve will come in their own time and I’m furious that this person made you doubt your work and, heaven forbid, if they made you doubt yourself as a writer at all. We lose so many promising writers to critiques like this which are so premature and self-centered. I agree with Neil: take what you can, but do not see this teacher as an authority or at all reflective on your true potential. Your true potential is brought out by hard work, and hard work is applied passion. Write what you want to write about, and write a lot of it!